We help organisations evaluate organisational psychosocial performance with a statistically reliable and valid survey. Aligned with psychosocial factors outlined in ISO 45003 standard and codes of practice, our diagnostic climate survey supports the identification of hazards, potential impacts and areas for improvement
It is often difficult to target the correct solutions, without a valid diagnosis. Psychosocial hazards are often invisible, making workforce feedback essential for identifying and addressing these factors effectively.
The Psychosocial Dx survey displays results in a way to support decisions gathers feedback on psychosocial risks across four key aspects:
Try our free Psychosocial Dx sample survey and get a sample report.
“Companies identifying and addressing psychosocial risks see 50% fewer mental health-related absences, contributing to higher team productivity.” (Source: World Health Organization, 2021)
1.) What is a psychosocial hazard and how does the Job Demands‑Job Resources-Worker Outcomes (JD-JR-WO) model explain it?
A psychosocial hazard is any aspect of work design, management, environment, plant, or workplace behaviour that can cause psychological or physical harm (e.g., high job demands, low control, poor support, bullying, violence, traumatic events).
The JD-JR-WO model shows job demands (e.g., workload, time pressure, role conflict) drive strain and health impairment, while job resources (e.g., autonomy, clarity, support, justice) drive motivation and engagement and buffer the impact of demands.
2.) What are the most common psychosocial hazards Australian employers need to manage?
Common hazards include high/low job demands, low job control, poor role clarity, inadequate support, workplace conflict, bullying/harassment (including sexual/gender‑based), violence/aggression, traumatic events, poor organisational change management, inadequate recognition, and remote/isolated work.
JD-JR-WO evidence links demands to burnout and resources to engagement, across multiple occupations.
3.) How do psychosocial hazards cause harm and what worker outcomes should we track?
Prolonged or intense stress from psychosocial hazards can cause psychological harm (e.g., anxiety, depression, PTSD, sleep disorders) and physical harm (e.g., fatigue‑related injuries, musculoskeletal issues).
In JD-JR-WO terms, demands → burnout/exhaustion while resources → engagement; burnout mediates the path to health problems, whereas engagement links to positive outcomes (e.g., lower turnover intention, better service quality).
4.) What are our legal duties in Australia and how does JD‑JR-WO help prove “reasonably practicable” risk management?
PCBUs must eliminate or minimise psychosocial risks, consult workers, apply the hierarchy of controls, and review controls—obligations now explicit in codes and regulations (e.g., NSW Code of Practice).
Using JD‑JR-WO, you systematically identify demands/resources, assess interactions, then control by redesigning work to reduce demands or increase resources first (higher‑order controls), before relying on training/EAP (lower‑order).
5.) How does FEFO Consulting apply the JD‑JR-WO model in Australian workplaces?
Refer to the Psychosocial Risk Assessment webpage to understand how to use diagnostic surveys to inform risk.
Refer to the Psychosocial Performance Assessment webpage to understand how to use diagnostic surveys to inform how to combine survey data with other inputs for a holistic understanding of your organisation’s psychosocial performance.